Forum: SDL Trados support
Topic: Is it possible to batch train an Adaptive MT engine?
Poster: Michael Beijer
Post title: You might have a point
[quote]SDL Community wrote:
[quote]Michael Beijer wrote:
However, I find the base quality level of their engines so bad that you would probably be better off using something good like DeepL, Google Translate (neural) or ModernMT (a relatively new player). I'm currently using ModernMT inside MateCat, and it is pretty darned good! It's also adaptive, but the initial output quality is MUCH better than anything SDL has to offer.
[/quote]
".... MUCH better than anything SDL has to offer that I am prepared to pay for." If you are using the free SDL Language Cloud then I'd agree. But if you were using the NMT engines then I would not, but these are not free. [/quote]
Also, ModernMT definitely isn't cheap.
Will have to try out SDL's NMT offering one of these days and report back!
Michael
Topic: Is it possible to batch train an Adaptive MT engine?
Poster: Michael Beijer
Post title: You might have a point
[quote]SDL Community wrote:
[quote]Michael Beijer wrote:
However, I find the base quality level of their engines so bad that you would probably be better off using something good like DeepL, Google Translate (neural) or ModernMT (a relatively new player). I'm currently using ModernMT inside MateCat, and it is pretty darned good! It's also adaptive, but the initial output quality is MUCH better than anything SDL has to offer.
[/quote]
".... MUCH better than anything SDL has to offer that I am prepared to pay for." If you are using the free SDL Language Cloud then I'd agree. But if you were using the NMT engines then I would not, but these are not free. [/quote]
Also, ModernMT definitely isn't cheap.
Will have to try out SDL's NMT offering one of these days and report back!
Michael